home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Path: news.uunet.ca!wildcan!sq!msb
- From: msb@sq.com (Mark Brader)
- Subject: Re: Example of an unintelligible program in C
- Message-ID: <1996Mar24.195859.14295@sq.com>
- Organization: SoftQuad Inc., Toronto, Canada
- References: <4iegj7$evn@bee.uspnet.usp.br> <4if0i4$qsm@garden.csc.calpoly.edu> <4ij8je$lb9@charm.il.ft.hse.nl> <4iq67bINN3gs@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 19:58:59 GMT
-
- > What about the use of putchar without having included <stdio.h>, hmm?
-
- The other points in the cited article were correct, but there is nothing
- wrong with allowing putchar() to be declared implicitly. printf() would
- be a different matter, of course. See section 7.1.7 of the standard
- (4.1.6 in the original ANSI version), 2nd paragraph.
- --
- Mark Brader | "scanf() is even more complicated and usually does
- msb@sq.com | something almost but not completely unlike what
- SoftQuad Inc., Toronto | you want." -- Chris Torek (after Douglas Adams)
-
- My text in this article is in the public domain.
-